Re: Sponsorship Funding of the LDP

[terry@animats.net]

On 24 Oct, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:

> If I were directing the LDP, though, I'd move even closer together. I
> would have the mandate focus enclusively on Linux education.  It would
> be "a project to document Linux" and say nothing about ownership.  LDP
> would be a conduit where any document relating to Linux could be
> found, whether free, OPL or commercial.  The LDP would be as much a
> "metadocument" as an actual repository.

Gary, there is absolutely nothing at all stopping you doing that right
now. Just build a meta-project that includes the LDP.

To want to put the LDP at the top of such a tree I think misses the
fundamental reason that the LDP was created and exists. The software is
free, so should the documentation be.

Terry

-- 
terry@animats.net, terry@linux.org.au, terry@albert.vk2ktj.ampr.org



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org